UK GOV: Full story here and here: Take better use of data
The digital revolution and fast technological advancements of recent years, have changed the way many businesses operate (Amazon, Skype), given rise to new ways of exchanging and providing services (Airbnb, TaskRabbit), have muddied the waters between work and leisure, and made it far harder to accurately measure economic output.
The report suggests that if the digital economy was fully captured by official statistics, it could add between one-third and two-thirds of a percent to the growth rate of the UK economy.
(VIDEO: If video don't load correct: Reload NIC on the week.)
WEF on the issue: Do we need to rethink how we measure economic activity?
UK GOV: Full report: Independent review of UK economic statistics: final report
What we are talking about here is: We are talking about the internet and its socio-economic impacts!
FT Financial Times / Blog: The internet and the productivity slump
US GOV: 2016 Economic Report of the President
From the US GOV report: Numerous studies show that access to broadband (read: Internet / Digital economy) contributes to local, regional, and national economic growth:
And the report concludes:
Access to the Internet not only enables firms to increase productivity, but it also provides an opportunity for entrepreneurs to experiment with innovative product ideas and new business models, and scale these ideas and models up quickly and cheaply. For example, on-demand economy platforms would not be possible but for the widespread adoption of Internet and wireless devices (i.e. Etsy, Ebay, Taskrabbit, Lyft, or Uber). Not only do these new business models help lower costs for consumers, leading to greater consumer surplus, but also they may increase business productivity.
And how strong is this connection, how great is the impact practically? Well:
"... a strong positive relationship between home Internet adoption and median income. Admittedly, higher income might lead to more Internet use, or vice versa, or there may be a third variable, such as education, that correlates with both outcomes."
No wonder "Internet" - and education - are essential parts of NIC process capital NPC - and education a major component of national human capital NHC.
Indeed: Strong drivers of the Digital economy: Internet and human capital, education. And (we having said all this) the UK GOV raport concludes concerning measuring GDP components:
Measuring the economy has become even more challenging in recent times, in part as a consequence of the digital revolution. ... Disruptive business models, such as those of Spotify, Amazon Marketplace and Airbnb, are often not well-captured by established statistical methods, while the increased opportunities enabled by online connectivity and access to information provided through the internet have muddied the boundary between work and home production.
This is a internal accounting problem, not a loophole for "new" GDP. The money is there (if all pay taxes, and even if they don't), e.g. there is no hidden money here to add to the GDP.
Voila: This is the intangible part, the magic of 1 + 1 being more than 2. The Digital economy creates new opportunities, spur to innovations and activities and creates networks we could not imagine, without the internet. This is the "spillover": Free of charge, whence the engine is running.
And present national accounting notices this all as growing GDP!
More magic: Bill Gates (right in picture with Paul Allen) started at home in the garage. You can call this home made "innovation factor" the growing total factor productivity surplus.
This is a developing story: Next update 12:00 CET 12/04/2016.
Next: Do we really need to recalculate (redefine) GDP? Do we need "New capital / New work" to explain growth and/or need we find new measures, like the Social Progress Imperative / Index SPI and understand how they impact GDP formation and growth - as national intangible capital drivers?
Stay tuned!
Any questions? Mail a NIC team member or mail your question to: nic research.
NOTE:
Till official release and publication of NIC 2016 Report in April (2016) we elaborate only NIC 2001-2013/14 public data based analysis and results, i.e. data available to all. Customers find latest NIC 2016 data and analysis results on login area. However: Elaborations and results presented here are tried to be in line with results you will find in the NIC 2016 Report and database.
The trend toward a gig economy has begun. For one thing, in this digital age, the workforce is increasingly mobile and work can increasingly be done from anywhere, so that job and location are decoupled. And also: The growing number of mobile platforms that effectively connect people who have certain goods, services and/or skills with those who don't, is making it possible for ordinary people to advertise and sell goods and services that used to be provided by full-time businesses.
And what is the value of this new business activity? Value estimate for US in 2025 (accrding to McKinsey&Company):
That equals 10-12% of US GDP 2025.
CBS News: Just how big is the gig economy
The Huffington Post: Heres what we can expect
McKinsey: Connecting talent with opportunity in the digital age
WEForum: What does data tell us about the gig economy
Equitable Growth: Trying to get a grip on the gig economy:
There are several national intangible capital NIC drivers in the midst of the gig economy (see Monday this week) and its emerging, getting stronger. We just highlight two process NPC and two renewal capital NRC drivers: "Favorable competition environment", "Convinience of establishing new firms", "Entrepeneurship" and "Availability of venture capital". They also highligh how US by far is a forerunner in this process already benefiting significantly from its impacts in GDP and how EU28 is just waking to realize embedded potentials:
This is a developing story: Next update 12:00 CET 13/04/2016.
Stay tuned!
Any questions? Mail a NIC team member or mail your question to: nic research.
NOTE:
Till official release and publication of NIC 2016 Report in April (2016) we elaborate only NIC 2001-2013/14 public data based analysis and results, i.e. data available to all. Customers find latest NIC 2016 data and analysis results on login area. However: Elaborations and results presented here are tried to be in line with results you will find in the NIC 2016 Report and database.
To make a complex story short and simple:
Latest developments in these assesments is presented by CHS Corrado-Hulten-Sichel definitions of "New capital" to be added to N = Monetized intangible capital:
These assesments has indeed enlarged our understanding of "intangible drivers" of the knowledge economy. However: There is a danger in monetizing intangibles: What about a (modern) car? How much is iron and steel (physical and tangible) and how much is embodied intangibles, knowledge? We soon come to the conclusion that the car is more intangile than tangile!
To avoid this pitt fall we have introduced the ELSS production function taking a slightly different approach.
ELSS production function follows the general production function, e.g. GDP = F(K, L, N) and incorporates some, but not all, of CHS intangibles in order to make "clear distincion between, what can be monetized and what not". But: To capture the whole spectra of intangibles we add to GDP a "New" driver, national intangible capital NIC as measured by the 48 NIC indicators, drivers in the categories of human, market, process and renewal (innovation) capital.
The production function now becomes GDP = F(G(NIC), K, L, N) with NIC as a major driver (denoted as G(NIC)):
Intangibles disclose new perspectives to explain hidden economic drivers. By introducing the ELSS production function (ELSS: Edvinsson, Lin, Ståhle P. & Ståhle S.), a new theoretically and computationally justified method we have been able to catch and disclose those impacts. By augmenting the Cobb-Douglas production function with a wide range of NIC indicators, we have managed to uncover 77% of hidden economic drivers (TFP, total factor productivity) in developed economies and to calculate the effect of intangible capital on GDP and growth.
introducing ELSS the results of our analysis show that intangible capital NIC accounts for some 45% of world GDP. The figure for the United States is 70.3% and for the European Union 51.6 %. The Nordic countries stand out with a higher figure at 64.7%, with NIC contributing to 72.5% of GDP in Sweden, 69.7% in Finland and 67.6% in Denmark (2014).
This is a developing story: Next update 12:00 CET 14/04/2016.
Next: Thursday: The ELSS approach.
Stay tuned!
Any questions? Mail a NIC team member or mail your question to: nic research.
NOTE:
Till official release and publication of NIC 2016 Report in April (2016) we elaborate only NIC 2001-2013/14 public data based analysis and results, i.e. data available to all. Customers find latest NIC 2016 data and analysis results on login area. However: Elaborations and results presented here are tried to be in line with results you will find in the NIC 2016 Report and database.
When looking for drivers of GDP formation and growth the fourth element we need to add to capital (K), working hours (L), investments in R&D and intangibles (N) is rather obvious and self evident: Value of natural and financial resources in excess. This addition also includes value of such elements as i.e. "cheap labor" and "extra ordinary tax benefits" etc.. Country vise these resources in excess contribute 20-30% of GDP. Some country examples:
These are strong country specific drivers of national economy and to account for these properly value of each driver is capitalized (monetized) and added to the ELSS production function as a fourth capital input driver (denoted O = Value of excess resources).
Having gatherd together (all) primary drivers of GDP formation and growth (capital, labor, investments in R&D and intangibles, excess resources and national IC, NIC): What is the explanatory power of the various production functions? How much of GDP is explained? Here is the estimate for developed countries:
Undisclosed drivers? As to our findings (Paper: Intangibles and national economic wealth – a new perspective on how they are linked. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 16 Iss: 1, pp. 20 - 57. ) global and domestic market linked TFP (Total Factor Productivity) spillovers account for major parts of these undisclosed drivers.
This is a developing story: Next update 12:00 CET 15/04/2016.
Next: Friday: GDP wrap up.
Stay tuned!
Any questions? Mail a NIC team member or mail your question to: nic research.
NOTE:
Till official release and publication of NIC 2016 Report in April (2016) we elaborate only NIC 2001-2013/14 public data based analysis and results, i.e. data available to all. Customers find latest NIC 2016 data and analysis results on login area. However: Elaborations and results presented here are tried to be in line with results you will find in the NIC 2016 Report and database.
Do we really need to recalculate (redefine) GDP? Do we need "New capital / New work" to explain growth? In fact, in our oppinion: There is little or nothing wrong with present GDP calculations - questions are mostly only about accounting accuracy (to capture "all" work, "all" business like activity etc.) and questions like " how are we to aggregate the national account".
But what we need to understand is that: Drivers of the economy and GDP is increasingly "value-drivers", e.g. what we value drives the economy. The question about "creating new job opportunities" should be formulated as "creating new opprortunities for value creation" or "creating new opportunities to exploit present values".Once value is created, reveald or reqognized jobs and firms will emerge.
Simple: The more we value "On demand services", "Freedom to work from home", "Mobility", "Recycling and sharing" etc. the more they are potential drivers of "New" GDP formation and growth in the knowledge economy. Only restrictive and reactionary national policies can hamper these positive economic prospects.
In this sence we need to find new measures, like the Social Progress Imperative / Index SPI measuring what we value and understand how these values increasingly impact GDP formation and growth - as national intangible capital drivers.
So: To boost the economy we once more need to focus on values and value creation:
We need to disclose and reqognize already present "New" values in our daily life (society) and we also need to refocus on value creation through innovations and the broad spectra of national intangible capital NIC.
NIC on the week: Next update 12:00 CET 18/04/2016.
Week 16: Storyline pending. Suggest a storyline?
Stay tuned!
Any questions? Mail a NIC team member or mail your question to: nic research.
NOTE:
Till official release and publication of NIC 2016 Report in April (2016) we elaborate only NIC 2001-2013/14 public data based analysis and results, i.e. data available to all. Customers find latest NIC 2016 data and analysis results on login area. However: Elaborations and results presented here are tried to be in line with results you will find in the NIC 2016 Report and database.
(VIDEO: If video don't load correct: Reload NIC on the week.)
innoFrugal 2016: Official website
innoFrugal 2015: InnoFrugal 2015 report
NIC on the week: Next update 12:00 CET 18/04/2016.
Week 16: Storyline pending. Suggest a storyline?
Stay tuned!
Any questions? Mail a NIC team member or mail your question to: nic research.
NOTE:
Till official release and publication of NIC 2016 Report in April (2016) we elaborate only NIC 2001-2013/14 public data based analysis and results, i.e. data available to all. Customers find latest NIC 2016 data and analysis results on login area. However: Elaborations and results presented here are tried to be in line with results you will find in the NIC 2016 Report and database.